Freedom of speech?

Wikileaks:

I believe that privacy should not be reviled publically unless for the use of justice. For sites like Wikileaks leaking private documents I’m strongly against it however, once again for justice I am all for exposing any potential war crimes that may have been committed.

I believe the world’s security is widely threatened by the website. This anti-American site surely does its job create a huge hassle and to NATO forces and their local national allies will be injured and killed because the information leaked on this site.

Wikileaks claims to be a “not-for-profit media organization. Our goal is to bring important news and information to the public.” I see this site with no filter... and completely unnecessary.

What astonishes me about this and the stuff WikiLeaks published a few months back is the sheer number of documents they've managed to get hold of.

There is no grand quest for truth, just an uncaring attempt to hassle a nonexistent enemy.

While reading over people’s blogs on the internet I found a wide range of good arguments… With the right point’s one can argue each side. As for me, I’m strongly against Wikileaks.

Here are some blogs that I found interesting:

http://www.ottawacitizen.com/news/todays-paper/Wikileaks+reveal+truth+about+guys/3903462/story.html

http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20101126215356AAE4Afy

Freedom of speech?

http://ca.answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20101025022224AAygVDK